Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHamman, Mary
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T18:39:30Z
dc.date.available2021-11-02T18:39:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHamman, M. (2020). The Demographics Behind Aging in Place: Implications for Supplemental Security Income Eligibility and Receipt. Retirement & Disability Research Consortium. https://cfsrdrc.wisc.edu/publications/working-paper/wi20-09.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/82404
dc.descriptionAlthough the U.S. population is aging, the population living in nursing homes has fallen, especially among low-income older adults. The report explores two possible drivers for this decline: increasing racial and ethnic diversity and increasing life expectancy among men.en_US
dc.description.abstractDespite population aging, the nursing home population has declined since the 1980s. Recent surveys indicate most older adults prefer to “age in place” rather than move into an institution and, since the 1990s, the share of adults aged 65 and older who live with their adult children has been increasing. These trends have important implications for the Supplemental Security Income program because maximum benefit amounts differ by place of residence, and benefit determinations may be more complex when older adults live with adult children. Prior research has focused on financial drivers of residency trends. This project will examine the role of two major demographic trends (1) Increasing racial and ethnic diversity, and (2) Increasing life expectancy of men. Using regression decomposition techniques and Decennial Census and American Community Survey data spanning 1980 through 2017, this project will answer the question: How much of the observed trend in living arrangements is attributable to changes in racial and ethnic composition or marital patterns as opposed to changes in the behavior of groups over time? This analysis may also inform understanding of the implications of aging in place for well-being in old age. Although aging-in-place advocates argue community residence is better than institutional residence, individuals who live independently incur room and board expenses and may rely more on informal care from relatives.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for Financial Security, Retirement and Disability Research Consortium, U.S. Social Security Administration.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCenter for Financial Securityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFY 2020 Papers;WI20-09
dc.relation.hasparthttps://cfsrdrc.wisc.edu/project/wi20-09en_US
dc.subjectHealthen_US
dc.subjectLong-term careen_US
dc.subjectSupplemental Security Incomeen_US
dc.subjectMedicaiden_US
dc.subjectAgingen_US
dc.subjectDemographicsen_US
dc.subjectH5en_US
dc.titleWI20-09: The Demographics Behind Aging in Place: Implications for Supplemental Security Income Eligibility and Receipten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record