Oak Regeneration Across Central and Northern Wisconsin

File(s)
Date
2012-05Author
Schwartz, Kevin M.
Publisher
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, College of Natural Resources
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
CHAPTER 1- STUMP SPROUT HEIGHT GROWTH SUCCESS RATE OF
NORTHERN PIN OAK AND LONG-TERM EFFICACY OF COPPICE
HARVEST IN CENTRAL WISCONSIN
Abstract: Coppice with 2-3 reserve trees per acre is the Generally Accepted Practice
(GAP) for managing oak stands on nutrient poor sandy sites (colloquially called "scrub
oak sites") in Wisconsin. The future stocking of the stand is therefore dependent
predominantly on stump sprouts with varying levels of contribution from advanced
regeneration. Two groups of sites ( 4 cut in 1998 and 4 cut in 2006) were measured to
examine the success of the stump sprouts. For the sites harvested in 2006 over 85 percent
of stumps had sprouted during the first year after harvest (Mujuri and Demchik 2009). By
2010, 74 percent of the sprouts from stumps that had sprouted had been successful in
reaching a height of at least 6 feet ( dete1mined to be beyond the height of heavy deer
browsing of the terminal buds). For the sites harvested in 1998, transects were run to
measure 25 stump sprouts and an additional 20, 11735th acre regeneration plots were
measured to determine the success of seedling regeneration. Ninety percent of
regeneration plots sampled had at least one desirable timber species with 85 percent of
the plots containing at least one viable oak seedling/sapling and 41 percent of these plots
contained an oak at least 10 feet tall. The average sprout height measured across all sites
was 24 feet. While there was some variability seen between sites that likely resulted from
varying site history, the GAP of coppice with reserve trees does seem to be effective at
regenerating scrub oak sites.
CHAPTER 2 -THE EFFECT OF RESERVE TREES ON OAK REGENERATION
ON SCRUB OAK SITES IN CENTRAL WISCONSIN
Anecdotally, higher retention levels after harvest are believed to have a negative impact
on oak regeneration accumulation. For this study, harvests with four retention levels of
0%, 15%, 30% and 45% were established to determine the impact of overstory retention
on success of oak regeneration after harvest. Previous research has shown that an
increase in reserve trees can increase the accumulation of the intermediate shade tolerant
oak as well as other intermediate and shade tolerant species while reducing the
abundance of more intolerant species such as aspen. Five sites were selected and three
replicates of each treatment were established. Four of the sites were harvested in the
winter of 2007 and one in the winter of 2008. Due to the time difference and variation,
the site harvested in 2008 was eliminated from the statistical analysis. The regeneration
levels in all plots met the requirements for adequate stocking based upon DNR set
standards. There were no significant differences between retention levels. Tallest
seedlings per plot were also analyzed to see if one retention level had taller seedlings
more likely to recruit into the overstory, but there were no significant differences. While
there were no significant differences between retention levels, there was an increasing
trend for height of desirable species other than oak, total arboreal seedlings, and both the
number and height of oak seedlings. At this stage of regeneration, it appears that oak can
persist under higher retention levels, but fu1iher study will be necessary to determine
recruitment into the canopy.
CHAPTER 3 - OAK ADVANCEDREGENERATION POTENTIAL ACROSS A
SITE QUALITY GRADIENT IN CENTRAL AND NORTHERN WISCONSIN
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine if habitat type (Kotar and Burger,
2002) can be used as an accurate predictor of oak advanced regeneration accumulation
and if so, to classify habitat types into three categories: "intrinsic accumulators",
"ambivalent accumulators" and "recalcitrant accumulators" (Johnson et al. 2002). Forest
managers across the state were asked which habitat types currently supported at least 40-
50% oak in the overstory. Based upon responses, the 9 most dominant (representing the
greatest number and coverage of counties) were selected to be included in the study. Due
to the mosaic nature of two sets of these habitat types, they were combined for
replication. For each habitat type/category 10 sites were selected including 5 replicates of
both high and low density to determine if canopy cover could also be used as a predictor
of oak regeneration. The main factors examined at each site were: stand density (basal
area), canopy cover, site index, and regeneration. Data analysis was done with a multifactorial
ANCOV A with deer browse intensity used as a covariate. Initial sampling and
research has shown that oaks regenerate more predictably on lower quality sites where
they have a higher competitive advantage and regenerate poorly on high quality sites
where they are often outcompeted by faster growing species. Only one habitat type
surveyed, AAt, was not fully stocked with oak regeneration. All other habitat
types/categories had sufficient oak regeneration (WIDNR 2006a), with some variability
between habitat types. According to the guidelines of Steiner et al. (2008), ArDe and
AQVb-Gr/ATiFrCi are the only habitat types fully stocked with oak when examining
aggregate height, without taking post-harvest stump sproti'ts into consideration. While
not significantly different, habitat types in central Wisconsin (Wood, Portage, Waupaca,
Juneau, Adams, Waushara, Marquette, and Green Lake counties) did tend to have higher
accumulation of oak seedlings, but in general, it appears that most of the habitat types in
this study are regeneration accumulators (with the exception of AAt). The lack of
successful regeneration of high quality oak sites, at least for the habitat types surveyed,
does not appear to be an advance regeneration barrier. There are a number of other
possible barriers, as well as the interaction of these barriers.
Permanent Link
http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/81662Description
Chapter 1 was written in the format for the Central Hard-woods Conference and chapters
2 and 3 were written in the format of the Society o.f American Foresters Northern
Journal of Applied Forestry.