Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPorcari, John
dc.contributor.authorMarx, Raymond
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-28T16:42:24Z
dc.date.available2017-09-28T16:42:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-28T16:42:24Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/76914
dc.description.abstractWaist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and percent body fat (%BF) are commonly used in wellness and clinical settings, and while there is only one commonly used method for measuring WHR, %BF can be determined in many ways. However, the accuracy, reliability, and cost of these many methods of calculating %BF vary greatly. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the LeanScreen's ability to measure WHR and %BF against laboratory validated methods. Eighty subjects participated in this study. Waist-to-hip ratio was manually measured and %BF was determined by the BOD POD. Two photographs were taken of the subjects with the LeanScreen app according to the procedures demonstrated by the app. No significant difference (p=0.554) was found for WHR between the LeanScreen app and manual WHR measurements, and 73 subjects (91%) were within one standard deviation (0.08) of the mean. A significant difference (p=0.015) was found between %BF determined by the LeanScreen app and the BOD POD. Although a high correlation exists between the two methods (r=.82), only 35 subjects were within +/- 3% of the BOD POD (SEE=5.1) In conclusion, the LeanScreen app accurately determines WHR but does not accurately determine %BF on an individual basis.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.subjectObesityen
dc.subjectKinesiologyen
dc.subjectHuman body -- density -- measurementen
dc.subjectBody compositionen
dc.titleAbility of the LeanScreen to accurately assess waist-to-hip ratio and percent of body fat in comparison to laboratory tested proceduresen
dc.typeThesisen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record