Path to normalization: finding and measuring the essentials of the Montessori method
File(s)
Date
2015-05-18Author
Harder, Elizabeth
Department
Montessori
Advisor(s)
Ward, Gay
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Montessori method is growing in public education. But it is a complex method with many aspects,
and there is much potential for misunderstanding and mis-emphasis. In the midst of the many external
pressures of a public school setting, the risk of emphasis on aspects of the philosophy that miss its essence are
even greater. How can Montessori as a discipline keep the essentials of its aims and methods from being
severely diluted? This researcher believes that the first vital step is to identify, measure and communicate with
clear contemporary language the unique aims of Montessori, both to ourselves and also to the greater
educational community.
To that end, this action research project first gathered data from authoritative Montessori sources on
what the essential elements are. There was a surprising disparity of opinion. But this data, along with a review
of literature, including Montessori's own writings, led this researcher to the conclusion that the essence of the
Montessori method is "normalization," which Montessori (1967) herself describes as "the single most
important result of our whole work."
Using the behavioral qualities which Montessori described as the natural result of normalization, the
researcher developed simple and objective data collection methods to measure for evidence of normalization,
and for its absence, in students at a primary-level classroom. Analysis of the data collection process concluded
that these measurement techniques may represent a promising starting point to develop a Montessori
assessment system which is both quantitative and objective - attributes that are particularly valued in public
school settings. These measurement techniques can be used to 1) help the teacher more quickly identify
students that are not getting the work they need to progress towards normalization, 2) to communicate our aims
to families in the form of longitudinal data that quantifies a child's progress on that path, and 3) to start to
consider success at school as something other than academic scores reflect, with measurements that also
consider the whole child.
Permanent Link
http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/72242Type
Thesis
Description
Plan B Paper. 2015. Master of Science in Education- Montessori--University of Wisconsin-River Falls. Teacher Education Department. 49 leaves. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 45-47).
Licensed under: