• Login
    View Item 
    •   MINDS@UW Home
    • MINDS@UW La Crosse
    • Murphy Library, UWL
    • UW-L Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   MINDS@UW Home
    • MINDS@UW La Crosse
    • Murphy Library, UWL
    • UW-L Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A Comparison of Body Density and Percent Body Fat Using Functional Residual Capacity and Residual Volume and Development of Immersed Functional Residual Capacity and Residual Volume Prediction Formulas

    Thumbnail
    File(s)
    koenig_joseph1990.pdf (2.686Mb)
    Date
    1990-12
    Author
    Koenig, Joseph
    Department
    Adult Fitness/Cardiac Rehabilitation
    Advisor(s)
    Floyd, William
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study developed prediction formulas (PF) for residual volume (PRV) and functional residual capacity (PFRC) using the variables age (A), height (Ht), weight (Wt), chest depth (CD), and smoking history (SH)in 100 male subjects between the ages of 18-69 years. A and Ht were the only variables which contributed significantly to PRV. A, Ht, and Wt were the only variables to contribute significantly to PFRC. A test-retest correlation between two trials of RV (r=.99) and FRC (r=.98) determinations indicated that reliable measures were taken by the closed circuit oxygen dilution technique. Through the use of multiple step-wise regression the following PRV and PFRC formulas were developed: PRV (liters)=.0260376(A) + .0256005(Ht) - 3.89794 PFRC (liters) = .0493365(Ht) + .0116958(A) - .00919313(Wt)-6.20966 The standard error of estimation (S.Y.E.) of the PRV and PFRC formulas (241 and 403 mls, respectively) were all lower than those reported by Boren et al . (1966) (B), Crapo et al . (1982) (C), Goldman and Becklake (1959) (GB). and Grimby and Soderholm (1963) (GS). The variation ( R ~ ) attributed to the independent variables was .72 and .4l for PRV and PFRC, respectively. These R' values were higher than those reported by B, C, and GS. Using the data obtained in this study, an ANOVA with repeated measures followed by a Scheffe' post hoc test determined significant differences (p<.05) between PRV and the PF of C and GB. Significant differences (p<.05) were also determined between PFRC and the PF of B, C. GB, and GS. A further purpose of this study was to compare body density (BD) and percent body fat (%BE) determined at the RV and FRC lung volume maneuvers in the hydrostatic weighing procedure. There was no significant difference (p>.05) between BD at RV and FRC. There was, however, a significant difference (p<.05)in %BF a t RV and FRC.
    Subject
    Body composition --Measurement
    Human body --Density --Measurement
    Hydrostatics --Technique
    Permanent Link
    http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/53061
    Type
    Thesis
    Part of
    • UW-L Theses & Dissertations

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of MINDS@UWCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback